The most important consideration for us here is whether there was any contributory negligence on your friend вЂ™ s part вЂ“ that is, I can be negligent and hit you with my car, but if you are were also negligent вЂ“ running across the street in the dark then despite my negligence, we will both be responsible.

I am not American, and so am not entirely familiar with US, or State law on this matter, however the law of negligence and product liability cases are based on common law which is extremely similar in the US and Canada. Nonetheless, we don вЂ™ t know enough about the circumstances of the scenario to make fair assessment as to what, if anything, this guy may be entitled to. However, in our case it doesn вЂ™ t appear that this is the kind of incident which would lend itself to a strong volenti defence. In law we regard activities like this (think playing hockey, downhill skiing, etc) as giving rise to something called the volenti defence whereby a defendant would assert that the plaintiff consented in some way to the injuries he sustained by virtues of the fact that the activity is inherently dangerous and by participating in it he was opening himself up to the potential for the injury to occur.

Waterskiing is an inherently dangerous activity. If I set fire to your house and burn my finger in the process, I won вЂ™ t recover damages from you simply because I don вЂ™ t have a medical insurance program вЂ“ the issue centres around whether I contributed in some way to the damage I suffered and whether you owed me any sort of duty with regard to circumstances surrounding my injuries. The fact that this guy doesn вЂ™ t have health insurance, or that he has a wife who doesn вЂ™ t work, etc, does not impact upon his legal rights. The information you have revealed, for the most part, is immaterial to the enquiry. I tend to agree that this is a situation where this person should seek legal council and explo re the potential for a lawsuit, however you haven вЂ™ t really given us enough information to go on here. The injured carpenter can certainly sue the waterski company, in fact anyone can sue just about anyone else, the real question to ask is whether he has any chance at winning. Mount Kirby Skis and Boards only provides the best techinicians around to perform your tuning needs, and it all starts at the top, with our Owner Keith Danielsen, who has been tuning skis since the 1970вЂ™s and still does today.Here are some responses to the question, 'SHOULD HE SUE?' Of course, along with a great machine, high quality tuning requires some very skilled individuals to do the job. Pneumatic Lift off cylinder for feed unit.Dressing Tool Advance 1/100 mm вЂ“ 6/100 mm.

Its features include a Variable Controlled: It also supports custom base structures to ensure that no ski or board will leave our shop without top-notch tunings. It is one of the most sophisticated robotic tuners around with over 25 pre-programmed base structures and the ability to produce up to 3 degrees of side-edge bevel. Mount Kirby is proud to boast 1 of only 4 of these prestigious machines to be found in tuning shops in North America. Mount Kirby takes the performance of your equipment as seriously as we do our own, which is why we use nothing but the best when it comes to treating skis and snowboards, and that is the Montana Snowchallenge. Service Center Keep your skis and snowboards in top conditionДЄlong with our top of the line skis, boards, and seasonal accessories, Mount Kirby is extremely proud of our valued and established Service Center.

Waterski kirby s